The BBC - The Bastardisation of British Culture-The Saga Continues Part 5

Elfgiva says:

I agree with you here mad mushroom. The apparent exclusion of all references to Christianity left me more than a little bemused, especially when the 'Old religion' is consantly being referred to. How logically can the old religion be called such, if there is no New religion? In this case, it seems the Old Religion is the only religion, practiced by half the population of Camelot, and more some.
There is good historical evidence to prove that a sizeable Christian communties existed in England by the fifth century, we know St Patrick was born in Roman Britannia. He wrote that his family had been Christian for at least 3 generations, and his case was by no means unique.


Mr B.J. Wiggett says:

I have a 2 year old daughter and I would rather her have her view of the world shaped by "the corrosive agents of left-wing dogma" than by the Daily Mail reading, xenophobic, right wing, ignorant bigots that make up most of the posts in this thread. By the way I am neither middles class, metrosexual nor from Islington, but I do believe that liberal virtues will one day prevail over fundamentalist right wing dogma that seems to be what some of you people think is what it means to be British (or English to be precise.)


Wulf V`s reponse:

I have a 3 year old daughter and I do not view it as anyone else`s responsibility to "shape her view of the world". That responsibility is mine.
I have not seen any "xenophobia" displayed in any of the aforementioned comments and neither do I seen any evidence of "right wing, ignorant bigots" posting on this thread unless you can show me otherwise?
Your knee jerk emotional reaction is quite typical of the so-called "liberal" left. If this discussion concerned the subject of white people usurping the mythical characters of other races and peoples I am sure that you would be one of this first to object but it would seem that the Aryan peoples are to be excluded the same rights accorded to other aboriginal peoples. We of all races and peoples are to be denied our ancient identity.
Using a British myth as a vehicle to project anti-white, multicultural and so-called "liberal" anti-values on to Britain`s past, albeit a legendary past is reprehensible and nothing more than cheap and obvious social engineering aimed at poisoning the minds of the ethnically English and British peoples at an early age.
By the way Arthur is a British and not an English myth. You do understand the difference between those two terms don`t you?